Differences in Offer and Acceptance Extracted from a doctoral dissertation entitled Hypothetical Jurisprudence in the Provisions of Financial Transactions and its Impact on Contemporary Issues, Based on the Book Fath al-Qadir by Ibn al-Hammam (d. 861 AH) A Comparative Jurisprudential Study

Abstract

Research Summary
This research revolved around the issue of selling on two conditions, and the research concluded:
The jurists differed on this issue, according to four opinions: First saying:
They allied themselves, and if they allied, the sale was annulled.
The second saying:
That is what the buyer says.
The third saying: They allied themselves if the difference occurred before taking possession, and if it was after it was split and according to the saying of the purchaser
Fourth saying:
The saying is the saying of the seller, if the buyer is satisfied with it, otherwise you want to sell.
The reason was their difference
It is not a contract and this sale is on two conditions. The dispute over the validity of some of the words of Ibn Masoud's hadeeth
Among the reasons is that the hadeeth of Ibn Masoud was hidden from some of the opponents, or that it was not authentic to them because they did not reach all of its chains of transmission.
The most correct opinion - and God knows best - is the fourth opinion, the saying of the Hanbalis:
For its agreement with the correct, clear hadith, and this is what called on Ibn Taymiyyah to make this statement more likely, as he said: What they said is contrary to the hadith of the Prophet, and what the hadith brought is the correct one.
And such a sale is not in line with our time, due to the lack of clarity in the method of buying and selling, and therefore the sale must be clear, clear, and sound, with one agreement between the two parties, and this sale is like companies selling materials that increase in value.

Keywords

Main Subjects

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics